Your Brother Daniel
For more great blogs
as this one go to Daniel’s blog site at:
www.Mannsword.blogspot.com
Immortality
and the Human Quest for Significance
Is there one drive
that especially characterizes us? In The
Significant Life, attorney George M. Weaver identifies our drive to
establish our self-importance:
· Individual humans are
not concerned so much about the survival of the species as they are about their
personal survival or significance. In order to push ourselves beyond our
confining space-time limits, we as individuals try to set ourselves apart from
the rest of humanity. It is unsettling to admit that one is average or ordinary
– a routine person. (7)
Weaver documents this
in many ways:
· Salvador Dali once
said, “The thought of not being recognized [is] unbearable”…Lady Gaga sings, “I
live for the applause, applause, applause…the way that you cheer and scream for
me.” She adds in another song, “yes we live for the Fame, Doin’ it for the
Fame, Cuz we wanna live the life of the rich and famous.” (7)
Perhaps one reason we
never achieve our longed-for significance is that it always seems to be
comparative. We need to be more
significant than the next guy. Writer Gore Vidal had been very transparent
about this:
· “Whenever a friend
succeeds, a little something in me dies.” (58)
Clearly, this drive
for significance tears at friendship, dividing instead of bringing together.
The jealousy displayed by comedian Al Jolson is reflective of the human
condition:
According to his biographer, “He once had a team of performing elephants fired because he thought the audience liked them too much.” (59)
According to his biographer, “He once had a team of performing elephants fired because he thought the audience liked them too much.” (59)
Some are very candid
about their quest for significance and pursue it without hesitation. But when
anyone detracts from their esteem, they become murderous. Haman, the
protagonist in the Book of Esther,
planned to kill the entire Jewish race because of the disrespect of one Jew:
· Haman went out that
day happy and in high spirits. But when he saw Mordecai at the king’s gate and
observed that he neither rose nor showed fear in his presence, he was filled
with rage against Mordecai. (Esther 5:9)
For some, the closest
they can come to immortality is the acclaim of the crowd. Even the
fantastically successful never outgrow this quest. Napoleon foolishly boasted:
There is no immortality but the memory that is left in the minds of men… History I conquered rather than studied.” (12)
There is no immortality but the memory that is left in the minds of men… History I conquered rather than studied.” (12)
But what is so
important about the “minds of men” that we so depend on their fleeting opinions
for our “immortality?” Rather than immortality, this seems to represent a
servile dependence on what others think. However, we tend to feel that the
acclaim of others enlarges us.
People achieve their
“immortality” in many different ways. In Fame,
The Psychology of Stardom, psychologists Evans and Wilson argue:
· What we try to create…
is some illusion of permanence. The desire for permanence drives people to
carve their name on trees and rocks, just like the handprints on Hollywood
Boulevard. We need to have an impact on life – to leave something behind us
when we go. (19)
Humanity so desires to
attach itself to something greater to elevate self. However, success is never
enough. Weaver cites President Lyndon B. Johnson as an example of this:
According to one commentator, “It is a curious footnote to
history that long before he ran into trouble, Johnson had turned central Texas
into a living monument to his heritage and his journey to the summit (the L.B.J
birthplace, the L.B.J. boyhood home, the L.B.J. state park, the L.B.J. ranch
and more).” (22)
However, “success” and
significance can be achieved in other ways. Weaver writes about the opposite
attempt to establish one’s mark on the world:
· In 2005 Joseph Stone
torched a Pittsfield, Massachusetts apartment building… After setting the
blaze, Stone rescued several tenants from the fire and was hailed as a hero.
Under police questioning, Stone admitted, however, that he set the fire and rescued
the tenants because, as summarized at trial by an assistant district attorney,
he “wanted to be noticed, he wanted to be heard, he wanted to be known.” (44)
Evidently, this drive
for significance is so powerful that it can overrule the moral dictates of
conscience. One mass-murderer gunman explained in his suicide note, “I’m going
to be f_____ famous.” (45)
This drive for
significance can even override all other affections. On December 8, 1980, Mark
David Chapman, a zealous fan of the Beatle, John Lennon, first obtained his
idol’s autograph before gunning him down. He explained:
· “I was an acute
nobody. I had to usurp someone else’s importance, someone else’s success. I
was ‘Mr. Nobody’ until I killed the
biggest Somebody on earth.” At his 2006 parole hearing, he stated: “The result
would be that I would be famous, the result would be that my life would change
and I would receive a tremendous amount of attention, which I did receive… I
was looking for reasons to vent all that anger and confusion and low
self-esteem.” (47)
By attaching himself
to someone greater, Chapman was able to elevate himself. Was it “low
self-esteem” or merely Chapman’s own way to achieve what everyone else is
trying to achieve – importance? Weaver reports that:
· More than two hundred
people confessed in 1932 to the kidnapping and murder of the infant son of
famed aviator Charles Lindbergh. (50)
The need for
importance is so powerful that it seems that people are willing to pay almost
any price for it. However, observing the insubstantiality of this pursuit, some
have converted absurd quest into a quest for ultimate meaning. It might take a
moral-crusader form. The UN claims: “The precious dignity of the individual
person is a central humanist value” (82-83). Even if true, is this mission also a reflection of the pursuit of
significance, disguised as a “nobler” quest? Is it a deceptive perversion of
something more immediate and tangible?
Meanwhile, others have
forsaken the temporary attainments of this world in favor of attaining
enlightenment and ultimately of being absorbed into a person-less nirvana, the
only reality – a universal consciousness where individual distinctions do not
exist. This is the monistic answer – a rejection of the illusory worldly
strivings in favor of a singular other-worldly pursuit, a real immortality, or
so it seems.
However, the poet
Miguel de Unamuno protested that the:
· “Tricks of monism
avail us nothing; we crave the substance and not the shadow of immortality.”
(84)
According to Unamuno,
monism presents a false hope. To whom does it offer immortality if the
individual no longer exists in the monistic heaven, but rather just a universal
consciousness? Is this immortality any more substantial than a dead body thrown
in the ground with a tree planted over it, eventually lifting its nutrients
into its branches and fruit? Is it any more substantial than Napoleon’s hope of
immortality in being remembered by others, by history, by something grander
than himself?
Chapman felt himself
elevated by Lennon’s autograph; others by achieving success and praise, even
worship. It seems that all of these attempts to take hold of immortality are
also attempts to join ourselves to something greater.
What do we make of
this quest? Is it entirely aberrant or does it reflect something essential
about our human reality? Often, our desires are curiously matched with
real-world objects. We hunger, and there is food; we thirst, and there is
drink; we tire and there is sleep; we are lonely, and there are friends and
family. Is it possible that our desire for significance is also matched with a
real-world fulfillment? Is there a God who has created us for relationship with
Him? Is it possible that our pursuit to be connected to something greater than
we is a reflection of a divinely implanted desire for God?
This desire remains
strangely unfulfilled in most people. Could it be that it has been misdirected
onto the wrong objects - success and notoriety? The Prophet Isaiah offered an
alternative solution consisting of spiritual food:
· “Come, all you who are
thirsty, come to the waters; and you who have no money, come, buy and eat! Come, buy wine and milk
without money and without cost. Why spend money on what is not bread, and your
labor on what does not satisfy? Listen, listen to me, and eat what is good, and
you will delight in the richest of fare. Give ear and come to me; listen, that
you may live… Seek the Lord while he may be found; call on him while he is
near. Let the wicked forsake their ways and the unrighteous their thoughts. Let
them turn to the Lord, and he will have mercy on them, and to our God, for he
will freely pardon.” (Isaiah 55:1-3, 6-7)
To receive from God is
to be free from our need to establish our self-importance, from the endless
burden to prove and to define ourselves! Instead, we were created to be beloved
by God and to love Him back.
No comments:
Post a Comment